Stupid question, will not you agree? Naturally, photography can be both.
From the time it was discovered in the early part of the nineteenth century, the art and science of photography has gone a long, long way.
It is really unfortunate that the first ever image may no longer be viewed even by those before us since it was annihilated accidentally not long after it came into existence ( reference : http://en.wikipedia.org / wiki / History_of_photography ). It is worth noting that we are very lucky to have experienced the effortlessness of today’s photography. In those early times, photographs cannot be captured if they don’t stay within the camera view field, unmoving, for a minimum of ten minutes as it was actually the “exposure time” length then.
Photography normally starts as a happy encounter for the first-timer. It then develops into a rather costly spare time interest. I remember how expensive it was when I made my initial shots as a newbie. Then, you would have to obtain rolls of film which cost a lot in my poor country. Technological breakthroughs later on made photography less and less pricey. In the present day’s environment, “everything” is digital from writing to computing, to photography and games. Things became both easier and less expensive, despite the higher efficiency due to technology.
But nevertheless, the art in photography is a very important component to consider particularly to hobbyists. Major photography executives also have to be creative, though, in order for their design to be economically viable.
Let us talk about the hobbyist first. The hobbyist has art and money invested in photography. He is into fiddling with methodologies and media. His finished products are for display to be valued and valued by chums and friends. His self image is more important than the commercial value of his photographic work. Some , however , enjoy it when offered a good amount for a specific work since it boosts his self-confidence. More of such “achievements” make him bask in his dexterity and popularity, with some cash to boot.
The professional is typically the better experienced and seasoned photographer. He is enterprising enough to earn income out of his photography art and abilities. He invests money in photography with the prime goal of making profits. He is more of a businessperson than an artist, but has the possibility and common sense to take pleasure in the best of both worlds. Pushing rather more forward places him in the class of hard core businesspersons, when he puts up his very own commercial photography and printing shop, employing the most recent and therefore , the most time- and cost-efficient technologies.
The professional who is a mix of the artist and the businessperson is the news correspondence type shutter-bug. This kind is more focused on the impact of his work on mass communication. He has to be creative enough to be credible and impactful and shrewd enough to place high cash value on his work.
Which kind of photographer are you?
Searching for great stills?
Visit the Hotel Photographer website and look through a range of great pictures.
There are lots of great Photography Websites out there so have a good skim and find some inspiration today.